About BRAF

The BRAF gene (B-Raf proto-oncogene) on chromosome 7q34 encodes a serine/threonine-protein kinase in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. The BRAF V600E mutation (c.1799T>A) is the most common activating mutation, found in ~50% of melanomas, ~10% of colorectal cancers, and ~45% of papillary thyroid carcinomas. BRAF spans ~190 kb with 18 coding exons.

NCBI Gene ID: 673 | RefSeq: NM_004333.6 | Genomic: NC_000007.14 (140719327-140924764)

BRAF Primer Design Challenges

  • V600E hotspot in exon 15: The most common mutation site requires precise amplicon placement around codon 600
  • GC-rich exon 15: Approximately 65% GC content around the V600E mutation site
  • Large introns: Introns 8 and 10 span>20 kb, requiring careful intron-spanning primer design for cDNA applications
  • Alternative splicing: Multiple BRAF transcripts (including truncated isoforms) require transcript-aware design
  • Pseudogene interference: BRAF pseudogene (BRAFP1) shares partial sequence homology with exons 4–11

Recommended Primer Design Parameters for BRAF

ParameterStandard ExonsGC-Rich Exons (11, 15)
Primer length20-22 nt22-25 nt
GC content45-55%50-60%
Tm58-62°C60-65°C
Amplicon size150-300 bp180-350 bp
Annealing temp58-60°C62-65°C
PCR additiveStandardAdd 5% DMSO or 1M betaine

Key SNPs to Avoid in Primer Binding Sites

When designing BRAF primers, avoid these clinically significant variants:

  • rs113488022 (c.1799T>A, V600E) — Most common BRAF activating mutation in melanoma
  • rs397516897 (c.1799_1801delTGA, V600_K601delinsE) — Exon 15 in-frame deletion-ins
  • rs121913351 (c.1397G>T, G466V) — Exon 11 kinase domain variant
  • rs121913370 (c.1742A>G, N581S) — Exon 15 mutation
  • rs121913355 (c.1406G>C, G469A) — Exon 11 non-V600 mutation

Clinical Validation Required
All BRAF primers designed with VigyanLLM are for research use only. Clinical diagnostic applications require additional wet-lab validation, Sanger sequencing confirmation, and regulatory approval before patient use.

Recommended Primer Sequences for BRAF — Engine-Designed on NM_004333.6

The three pairs below were produced by VigyanLLM's automatic primer design engine directly against the Homo sapiens BRAF RefSeq mRNA NM_004333.6 (6459 nt), under the engine's default constraints: 18–25 nt primers, Tm 57–72 °C (optimum 62 °C), GC 40–60%, and an 80–1500 bp amplicon (optimum 150 bp). Every oligo was then re-checked back against the accession — each forward primer matches the sense strand at its stated 1-based position and each reverse primer matches the reverse complement ending at the amplicon's final base (3 of 3 exact matches for this page).

PairForward (5′→3′)Reverse (5′→3′)Tm fwd / revGC fwd / revAmplicon
15′-TCAGCGAGAAAGGAAGTCATC-3′5′-TCACTGCCACATCACCATG-3′58.4 / 58.4 °C47.6 / 52.6%182 bp (nt 1492–1673)
25′-AAACACTTGGTAGACGGGAC-3′5′-TGCCACTTTCCCTTGTAGAC-3′58.1 / 58.1 °C50.0 / 50.0%115 bp (nt 1542–1656)
35′-ACCTCAGCGAGAAAGGAAG-3′5′-ATCTGCCCATCAGGAATCTC-3′57.4 / 57.4 °C52.6 / 50.0%108 bp (nt 1489–1596)

Pair 1 leads with a forward/reverse Tm spread of 0.0 °C, no stable hairpin at 37 °C (ΔG ≥ 0.0 kcal·mol−1 on either oligo), self-dimer Tm at most -29.7 °C, no cross-dimer signal, no pair warnings, and a Primer3 pair-quality score of 100.0/100; the suggested starting annealing temperature is 53.4 °C. Pairs 2 and 3 are alternates from the same run — compare their Tm, GC and product columns above against your chemistry (dye-based or probe), then confirm every candidate in silico and on a gel before use.

Specificity has not been verified.
The automated Primer-BLAST pass that accompanies each design came back inconclusive — no expected amplicon was parsed from the report — so treat specificity as an open question. Confirm each pair with NCBI Primer-BLAST before ordering, and remember that a transcript-based search cannot reveal genomic-repeat or pseudogene off-targets.

How to read this table: these are default whole-transcript designs — they demonstrate what the engine produces under standard constraints and are not positioned over the clinically relevant variants discussed below; to land an amplicon on a specific codon or repeat, design against that region deliberately. Thermodynamics come from Primer3's nearest-neighbor engine (SantaLucia 1998). Example output only: validate each candidate experimentally (gel sizing, efficiency series, melt-curve or probe check) before relying on it.

Design Guidance for BRAF Assays

BRAF is a serine/threonine kinase in the RAS–MAPK cascade. Most BRAF alterations are single codon-600 substitutions, of which V600E (c.1799T>A, exon 15) dominates in melanoma, colorectal, thyroid and other tumours, with a long tail of non-V600 variants in codons 600, 601 and the activation segment.

Two design notes. First, BRAF has a well-characterised processed pseudogene, BRAFP1, with extensive sequence homology to BRAF: a pair that fits the transcript perfectly can still amplify the pseudogene on genomic DNA, so an in-silico specificity check against genomic resources is essential for gDNA assays. Second, decide the readout before ordering — Sanger or amplicon sequencing wants the variant centred in a short exon-15 product, while an allele-specific (ARMS-style) reaction wants the discriminating base at the 3′ end of a dedicated primer. Keep products short for FFPE-derived DNA (the example pair is 182 bp; re-run with a tighter window if your template is degraded) and validate efficiency on a dilution series before using the assay quantitatively.

Treat these pairs as validated starting candidates, not finished assays: check the binding sites for common variants to avoid allele dropout, re-run specificity against your template type, optimise annealing by gradient around 53.4 °C, confirm a single expected band, and document everything (sequence, lot, efficiency, RefSeq) so the run is reproducible.

References

  • NCBI Nucleotide — RefSeq NM_004333.6 (Homo sapiens BRAF mRNA).
  • NCBI Gene — BRAF (Homo sapiens).
  • SantaLucia J Jr. A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:1460–1465.
  • Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:W115–W118.
  • Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, et al. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res 2009.
  • Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 2009;55:611–622.

Design BRAF Primers Now

Pre-configured with BRAF-specific parameters. Enter exon number or genomic coordinates.

Design BRAF Primers →